<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5.0 Mustang &amp; Super Fords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cimax-online.info/5-0-mustang-super-fords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cimax-online.info/5-0-mustang-super-fords/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:39:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: EPA316</title>
		<link>http://www.cimax-online.info/5-0-mustang-super-fords/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>EPA316</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cimax-online.info/5-0-mustang-super-fords/#comment-229</guid>
		<description>I have almost every issue of this magazine, from way back in 1994 when it was bi-monthly, and there was no &quot;&amp; Super Fords&quot; in the title. I have been a steady subscriber ever since. They have made one heck of a lot of progress in less than 15 years. They put out a lot of great info here, and you can tell the writers are serious Mustang freaks, as they should be. BUT.. there are a few little things that irritate me from time to time. I wish when they show how to install a part, they would do before &amp; after dyno runs, AND 1/4 mile track runs, on every installation. Sometimes they do just the dyno run, so you don&#039;t know how it actually affects performance. Also, I wish they would make it a rule to always point out when a modification will make the car unable to pass smog inspection. 
&lt;br /&gt;In fairness, they do this sometimes, and all the other Mustang mags I have read are the same way. 
&lt;br /&gt;They have articles here for people who just want to pep up their daily driver, and also articles for building a 9 second dragstrip terror, and everything in between. If only they would lean a little more toward the daily driver end of the spectrum, it&#039;d be a perfect magazine, but as it is, it&#039;s pretty close to perfect already. The only other gripe I have is they need to pay a LOT more attention to the V6 Mustangs, of all years!
Rating: 4 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have almost every issue of this magazine, from way back in 1994 when it was bi-monthly, and there was no &#8220;&#038; Super Fords&#8221; in the title. I have been a steady subscriber ever since. They have made one heck of a lot of progress in less than 15 years. They put out a lot of great info here, and you can tell the writers are serious Mustang freaks, as they should be. BUT.. there are a few little things that irritate me from time to time. I wish when they show how to install a part, they would do before &#038; after dyno runs, AND 1/4 mile track runs, on every installation. Sometimes they do just the dyno run, so you don&#8217;t know how it actually affects performance. Also, I wish they would make it a rule to always point out when a modification will make the car unable to pass smog inspection.<br />
<br />In fairness, they do this sometimes, and all the other Mustang mags I have read are the same way.<br />
<br />They have articles here for people who just want to pep up their daily driver, and also articles for building a 9 second dragstrip terror, and everything in between. If only they would lean a little more toward the daily driver end of the spectrum, it&#8217;d be a perfect magazine, but as it is, it&#8217;s pretty close to perfect already. The only other gripe I have is they need to pay a LOT more attention to the V6 Mustangs, of all years!<br />
Rating: 4 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

